This interlocutory order allowed an application by applicants to replace specific pages of the appeal synopsis and memo, permitting necessary amendments with liberty.
Prayer for replacing pages of synopsis and memo of appeal allowed. Liberty granted to make necessary amendments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC030006922026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/171/2026
Sh. Laltluangpuia and 38 Ors. S/o Laibuanga Khankawn Village P. O. Champhai Pin 796321
2: Sh. S. Lalthlamuana S/o Ronghaka Khankawn Village P. O. Champhai Pin 796321
3: Smt. Zamani W/o Kaplinga (L) Khankawn Village P. O. Champhai Pin 796321
4: Sh. Laibuanga S/o Kaplinga (L) Khankawn Village P. O. Champhai Pin 796321
5: Sh. Rotluanga S/o Awithangpa (L) Khankawn VIllage P. O. Champhai Pin 796321 VERSUS
Union of India and 6 Ors. Through the Secretary
Page No.# 2/3
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways New Delhi Pin 110001 2:The Commander GREF Project Pushpak HQ C/o 99 APO Pin 9317xx Aizawl Mizoram 3:The Officer Commanding 74 RCC (GREF) Zotlang Champhai Mizoram Pin 796321 4:The State of Mizoram Through the Secretary Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl Pin 796001 5:The Deputy Commissioner/District Collector Champhai District Mizoram Pin 796321 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Mangsuanhau Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
Date : 16.09.2026 (K.R. Surana, J)
Heard Mr. Joseph Mangsuanhau, learned counsel for the applicants. Also
Page No.# 3/3
heard Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC, representing respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State, representing respondent no.4.
of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the prayer for replacing synopsis pages and memo of appeal pages in the connected appeal.
Sh. Laltluangpuia and 38 Ors.
Union of India and 6 Ors.
Kalyan Rai Surana
Rajesh Mazumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
