Daibaki Das Vs Bipul Tamuli

¶1

Page No.# 1/5

¶2

GAHC010086252026

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1435/2026

¶5

DAIBAKI DAS

¶6

W/O LATE CHANDRADHAR DAS, R/O ATHGAON, RANGMAHAL, P.O.RANGMAHAL, P.S.- CHANGSARI, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781030

¶7

2: ARABINDA DAS S/O LATE CHANDRADHAR DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030

¶8

3: NARAYAN DAS S/O LATE CHANDRADHAR DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030

¶9

4: KHARGESWAR DAS S/O LATE CHANDRADHAR DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030

¶10

Page No.# 2/5

¶11

5: ANIL DAS S/O LATE CHANDRADHAR DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030 6: NRIPEN DAS S/O LATE KHAGEN DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030 7: PRADIP DAS S/O LATE KHAGEN DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030 8: AKSHAY DAS S/O LATE KHAGEN DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030 9: SMTI. DILIPI DAS W/O LATE MATIRAM DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM

¶12

Page No.# 3/5

¶13

PIN-781030

¶14

10: DEBOJYOTI DAS S/O LATE MATIRAM DAS R/O ATHGAON RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78103

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

BIPUL TAMULI

¶17

S/O LATE SRIDHAR TAMULI, R/O NAJIRAKHAT, RANGMAHAL, P.O.RANGMAHAL, P.S.- CHANGSARI, PIN-781030

¶18

2:KALPA JYOTI TAMULI S/O LATE SHREEDHAR TAMULI R/O NAJIRAKHAT RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI PIN-781030

¶19

3:RAJIB JYOTI TAMULI S/O LATE SHREEDHAR TAMULI R/O NAJIRAKHAT RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- CHANGSARI PIN-78103

¶20

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BANIK, SR. ADV., MS F BEGUM,T SARKAR

¶21

Advocate for the Respondent : MR N PATIRI,

¶22

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Date : 06.05.2026

¶25

1. Heard Mr. S. Banik, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. F. Begum, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N. Patiri, learned counsel for the

¶26

Page No.# 4/5

¶27

opposite party No. 1.

¶28

2. This application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the applicant in connection with FAO No. 22/2026.

¶29

3. The learned senior counsel for the applicant submits that in the connected FAO No. 22/2026, by order dated 24.03.2026, passed in the interlocutory application being I.A.(C) No. 932/2026, this Court directed both the parties to main status quo in respect of the suit property till next returnable date i.e., till 7^th of April, 2026. Thereafter, on 7^th of April, 2026, the interim order of status quo was extended till next date.

¶30

4. He further submits that next date of the connected FAO is fixed on 22^nd of May, 2026. However, he submits that before the trial court, the Title Suit No. 68/2026 is fixed on 19^th of May, 2026 along with connected Misc.(J) Cases and, therefore, he submits that since the orders passed in this appeal may have bearing in the pending title suit till the disposal of the connected FAO, the proceedings of Title Suit No. 68/2026 as well as connected Misc. cases before the trial court may be stayed.

¶31

5. Mr. N. Patiri, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1 has not opposed the prayer subject to the maintenance of status quo in respect of the suit property by both the parties.

¶32

6. Since, the respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff before the trial court, whereas respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are only the proforma defendant in the said suit, notice to said opposite parties in this interlocutory application is waived.

¶33

7. Since, the respondent No. 1 has agreed to the prayer made by the learned senior counsel for the applicant, same is allowed.

¶34

Page No.# 5/5

¶35

8. The Title Suit No. 68/2026 along with Misc.(J) Case No. 85/2026 as well as Misc.(J) Case No. 102/2026 pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kamrup, Amingaon shall remain stayed during the pendency of the FAO No. 22/2026 before this Court. Both parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the suit property, as was directed earlier, till disposal of the connected FAO.

¶36

9. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of.

¶37

JUDGE

¶38

Comparing Assistant

Daibaki Das v. Bipul Tamuli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daibaki Das v. Bipul Tamuli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt Sunita Devi and 4 Ors.

Gautam Chandra Vs Md. Hanifuddin and 2 Ors.

On the Death of Bajranglal Modi His Legal Heir Smt Prem Lota Modi Vs Sri Raj Kumar Modi and 3 Ors.

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Abed Ali and 5 Ors.

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Anjali Kalita and Anr.

Smt. Satyabati Rajbonshi and Anr. Vs Manoj Koch @ Manoj Koch Rajbonshi