Allowed¶24

Sri Debajit Gogoi Alias Jugo v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC16 Mar 2026Bail Appln./778/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application; Section 483 BNSS 2023; Gauhati High Court; Parthivjyoti Saikia, J.; Debajit Gogoi @ Jugo; State of Assam; P.R. Case No. 146/2026; Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026; Chief Judicial Magistrate Jorhat; attack with sharp weapons; simple injuries; charge sheet filed; trial ongoing; bail bond Rs.25,000 with one surety of like amount; appearance directive on hearing dates.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail in connection with P.R. Case No. 146/2026 arising out of Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat, on execution of a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount; petitioner directed to appear before the Trial Court on each and every date of hearing. ¶24

Sri Debajit Gogoi Alias Jugo Vs the State of Assam — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶24

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, Sri Debajit Gogoi @ Jugo, should be released on bail in connection with P.R. Case No. 146/2026 arising out of Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat.

¶17

Court's answer

Considering the entire aspect of the matter, the Court held that under the given circumstances there is no necessity for keeping the petitioner in custody.

¶23

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner was allowed to go on bail in connection with P.R. Case No. 146/2026 arising out of Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026 on execution of a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat.

¶24

Key takeaways

As a condition of the bail, the petitioner was directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date of hearing, failing which the Trial Court has liberty to take steps to procure his attendance.ratio¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Gauhati High Court (Parthivjyoti Saikia, J.), order dated 17.03.2026 in Bail Appln./778/2026 — Sri Debajit Gogoi alias Jugo v. State of Assam: Bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 allowed. Petitioner released on bail in connection with P.R. Case No. 146/2026 arising out of Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat, where police had already filed the charge sheet and trial was ongoing. Underlying allegation: attack on the informant and his friend by unknown persons with sharp weapons on 30.01.2026; informant sustained simple injuries. Bail granted on execution of a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount; petitioner directed to appear before the Trial Court on each and every date of hearing, failing which the Trial Court may take steps to procure his attendance.

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010055022026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./778/2026

¶6

SRI DEBAJIT GOGOI ALIAS JUGO

¶7

SON OF LATE LILA GOGOI RESIDENT OF KATHHANIBARI GAON UNDER PULIBOR POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT, ASSAM.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B M CHOUDHURY, MR. U CHOUDHURY

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶12

BEFORE

¶13

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

¶14

ORDER

¶15

17.03.2026

¶16

Heard Mr. B M Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶17

By this application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioner, namely, Sri Debajit Gogoi @ Jugo, has prayed for release on bail in connection with P.R. Case No. 146/2026 arising out of Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat.

¶18

On 30.01.2026, the informant received a phone call from his friend who claimed that he and his associates

¶19

Page No.# 2/2

¶20

were attacking by some persons. The informant immediately went there to save his friend and his associates. When the informant reached the spot, he found that his friend and some other persons were present there. Then the unknown persons had attacked the vehicle of the friend of the informant and, thereafter, the persons attacked the informant with sharp weapons.

¶21

Medical Report shows that the informant sustained simple injuries.

¶22

In this case, Police has filed charge sheet and the trial is also going on.

¶23

Considering entire aspect of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that under the given circumstances, there is no necessity for keeping the petitioner in custody.

¶24

In view of the above, the petitioner, namely, Sri Debajit Gogoi @ Jugo, is allowed to go on bail in connection with P.R. Case No. 146/2026 arising out of Pulibor P.S. Case No. 06/2026 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat by executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat.

¶25

The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date of hearing as fixed by the Trial Court failing which the learned Trial Court shall have the liberty to take steps for procuring the attendance of the petitioner.

¶26

The bail application is disposed of.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Sri Debajit Gogoi Alias Jugo v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Debajit Gogoi Alias Jugo v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maisnam Riten Kumar Singh Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Sodip Choudhury Vs the State of Assam

Sahida Khatun and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Ruhel Ahmed Alias Munna Ahmed Vs the State of Assam

Sri Binanda Neog Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Fokhoruddin Ali Ahmed Vs Samsul Hoque Khandekar