The Gauhati High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, noting the lack of specific allegations against him despite serious charges in the FIR.
The petitioner was enlarged on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010203912026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2798/2026
NOEEM UDDIN @ NAIM UDDIN
S/O LT. KAMAR UDDIN, R/O VILL- MOUZKANI, P.O. AND P.S. AND DISTSRIBHUMI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A S TAPADER, MR M AHMED,MS. M BEGUM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER
Date : 17.09.2026
Heard Mr. AS Tapader, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Page No.# 2/3
3(9) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of DSB, Sribhumi District stating inter alia that a group of persons including the petitioner without any authority or without any professional qualification had taken a position in and around the precincts of the Sribhumi Police Station and making a livelihood from the members who come to the said Police Station. It is further stated that the group including the petitioner use to lure the person who comes to the Police Station and makes them filed the FIR or reach settlement and gives advice to them and as a result of the same, they take money from the persons.
i) the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when
Page No.# 3/3
called for.
ii) the petitioner will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case.
iii) the petitioner will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court.
6. Petition is disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Noeem Uddin @ Naim Uddin
The State of Assam Represented by the Learned PP, Assam
Shamima Jahan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
