Allowed¶24

Sanidul Islam v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC15 Jul 2026Bail Appln./1928/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted - Gauhati High Court - Bail Appln./1928/2026 - Sanidul Islam v. State of Assam - undertrial bail after arrest on NBWA issued for default in appearance before trial court - trial under Section 366(A) of IPC in Sessions Case No. 62/2023 before Sessions Judge, Barpeta - bail of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount - conditions: availability for remaining trial, no hampering or tampering with evidence - violation entails cancellation of bail - order dated 16.07.2026 by Justice Pranjal Das.

What did the court decide?

Release of the accused petitioner on bail of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount, subject to the conditions that he (a) shall be available for the remaining trial and (b) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence; the bail application stands allowed and disposed of. ¶24

Sanidul Islam Vs the State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010144332026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./1928/2026

¶6

SANIDUL ISLAM S/O AZMAT ALI VILLAGE SALIMPUR P.O. PAHUMARA P.S. BAGHBAR DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM PIN 781308 VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SAIFUL ISLAM, MR. R ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶9

BEFORE

¶10

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

¶11

ORDER

¶12

16.07.2026

¶13

Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶14

The petitioner, namely, Sanidul Islam is facing trial in connection with Sessions Case No. 62/2023 under Section 366(A) of IPC pending before the court of learned Sessions Judge, Barpeta.

¶15

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to default

¶16

Page No.# 2/2

¶17

in appearance before the learned trial court, NBWA was issued against the petitioner and accordingly, he was arrested and presently in judicial custody.

¶18

Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner will appear regularly and will co-operate with the trial and abide by any condition imposed if granted bail at this stage.

¶19

Upon perusing the materials available at this stage, I am of the considered view that the bail petition can be disposed of today by granting bail to the accused in view of the undertaking made on his behalf.

¶20

Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioner:

¶21

(a) shall be available for the remaining trial.

¶22

(b) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence.

¶23

Violation of bail conditions entails cancellation of bail.

¶24

Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of .

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Sanidul Islam v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanidul Islam v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afjal Ali Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Poragmoni Nath Vs the State of Assam

Matiur Rahman Vs the State of Assam

Muzammel Hoque and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam

Shri. Waluniba and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Nagaland and 8 Ors.

Shri. Tibet Assumi Vs the State of Nagaland and Anr.