Bail application heard after the police filed the charge sheet within the statutory period; the Court did not consider bail on merits but directed the petitioner to appear before the trial court for seeking regular bail and disposed of the application with that direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010091902026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1233/2026
SRI PAWAN CHOUDHURY
SON OF KAMAL CHOUDHURYRESIDENT OF WARD NO.4, RAIBAHADUR LANE, JORHAT EAST, UNDER JORHAT POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B M CHOUDHURY, MR. U CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2026
Mr. P S Lahkar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has submitted that in this case police has filed the Charge Sheet being CS No.83/2026 dated 24.05.2026.
Page No.# 2/2
With the aforesaid direction, this Bail Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should decide the bail application where the police have already filed the charge sheet within the statutory period.
Sri Pawan Choudhury
The State of Assam represented by the P.P. Assam
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
