The Gauhati High Court converted interim bail to absolute bail for the petitioner and disposed of the anticipatory bail application, subject to conditions for trial attendance and non-interference with evidence.
Interim bail converted to absolute; anticipatory bail application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010088142025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/965/2025
MANDEEP BARUAH S/O- PROMOD CHANDRA BARUAH, R/O- AMARGHAR, FLAT NO.A005, OPPOSITE TO PANIKHETI BAZAR, PANIKHETI, P.ONARENGI, P.S- NOONMATI, PIN-781026, DIST.- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY BY PP ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S H SIKDAR, A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER
16.09.2026
Page No.# 2/2
station, inter alia, alleging that his son, who was married to Ms. Kriti Gurung has been abducted by the daughter-in-law of the first informant.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to make interim bail absolute and dispose of the anticipatory bail application after investigation completion.
Whether the petitioner hampers or tampers with evidence given the familial nature of the dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mandeep Baruah
The State of Assam
Pranjal Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
