Disposed¶23

Riazul Hussain v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC4 May 2026AB/498/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pre-arrest bail (anticipatory bail) application AB/498/2026, Gauhati High Court, Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria, decided 05-05-2026; Riazul Hussain v. The State of Assam; GD entry and preliminary enquiry only, no FIR registered; petitioner appeared before I.O. on 12.03.2026 and 23.03.2026 and before Police Officer on 25.03.2026, released after interrogation; interim protection of 10.03.2026 vacated/recalled; application disposed of with liberty to approach appropriate forum if any case is registered; Fatashil Ambari Police Station report kept on record.

What did the court decide?

In view of the police report showing no registration of FIR against the petitioner, the present pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. ¶23

Riazul Hussain Vs the State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010041602026

2026:GAU-AS:6100

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/498/2026

¶6

RIAZUL HUSSAIN

¶7

S/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN, R/O ULUBARI, HAFIZ NAGAR, P.S. PALTANBAZAR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K BARMAN, MR. R KONWAR,MR D PEGU,MR H ALI

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶12

BEFORE

¶13

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

¶14

ORDER

¶15

05-05-2026

¶16

Heard Mr. H. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶17

2. Report received from the concerned police station.

¶18

3. It is submitted by Mr. Ali, learned counsel that it was stated by the I.O. that the petitioner did not appear before the Police Station during enquiry, he

¶19

Page No.# 2/2

¶20

filed an additional affidavit through which it has brought into the record that he appeared before the I.O. on 12.03.2026 and subsequently, on 23.03.2026 and he was accordingly interrogated.

¶21

4. Mr. Borthakur, learned APP submitted in this regard that as per report received from the concerned Police Station, it reveals that petitioner appeared before the Police Officer on 25.03.2026 and after interrogation he was released from police station, as no has is registered till date.

¶22

5. It reveals from the report that initially a GD entry was made and on the basis which a preliminary enquiry was made, but till date there was no registration of FIR against the present petitioner.

¶23

6. In view of this, the present pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of.

¶24

7. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum in the event of registering any case against him.

¶25

8. The interim protection provided to the present petitioner on 10.03.2026 is hereby stands vacated/recalled.

¶26

9. The report received from the Fatashil Ambari Police Station be kept as part of the record.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Riazul Hussain v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riazul Hussain v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhijit Bora Vs the State of Assam

Monowar Hossain Vs the State of Assam

Ajibar Rahman Vs the State of Assam

Tashir Alias Tashiruddin Seikh and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Sophil Ali Vs the State of Assam

Zakir Hussain Vs the State of Assam