The Gauhati High Court closed the present anticipatory bail application as no criminal case had been registered against the applicant at the concerned police station.
Special leave to file another anticipatory bail application granted. No harassment to be meted out to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010191542026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2165/2026
SRI BHABIT SAIKIA ALIAS PIYARI S/O LATE PUNESWAR SAIKIA
R/O- MOIDOMIA, BARBOSA, NORTH LAKHIMPUR, P.O. AND P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MR. S ALI,MR B ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
ORDER
14.09.2026
Heard Mr. J.C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, on the basis of
the written instruction received, has submitted that no case has been registered against the petitioner at the concerned Police Station.
Page No.# 2/2
In view of above, the present anticipatory bail application stands closed accordingly.
It is, however, made clear that no harassment shall be meted out to the petitioner by the police.
The communication of the concerned Police Station be kept on record.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be allowed in view of no FIR being registered against the petitioner.
Bhabit Saikia alias Piyaari S/o Late Puneswar Saikia
The State of Assam
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
