Sri Bhabit Saikia Alias Piyari v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that no FIR was registered against the petitioner. Consequently, the court closed the application but directed the police not to harass the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail application closed; direction issued to police not to harass the petitioner.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010191552026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2164/2026
SRI BHABIT SAIKIA ALIAS PIYARI S/O LATE PUNESWAR SAIKIA
R/O- MOIDOMIA, BARBOSA, NORTH LAKHIMPUR, P.O. AND P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MR. S ALI,MR B ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application is maintainable in view of non-registration of any FIR against the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri Bhabit Saikia Alias Piyari S/o Late Puneswar Saikia
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/2164/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court