Allowed

Ranjan Bordoloi and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC15 Sept 2026AB/2113/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition filed under Section 482 BNSS for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault requiring brain surgery and ICU care, the Gauhati High Court observed that the serious nature of the injuries precluded bail. The application was subsequently allowed and disposed of without recording reasons.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. Case diary is to be returned.

Ranjan Bordoloi and Anr. Vs the State of Assam — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010184942026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

¶5

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶6

Case No. : AB/2113/2026

¶7

RANJAN BORDOLOI AND ANR S/O GOKUL BORDOLOI, R/O VILLAGE- JOYRAPUR GAON, P.S.SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM

¶8

2: PARTHAJYOTI NAUKAKHYA S/O BINANDA SARMAH R/O BARHOITING P.S.- SIVASAGAR DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR ASSA

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BORUAH, MS. P BORAH,MS. M BHUYAN,MR. M ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶12

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

¶13

ORDER

¶14

16.09.2026

¶15

Heard Mr. K. Boruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶16

This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioner, namely, Ranjan Bordoloi and Parthajyoti Naukakhya , apprehending arrest in

¶17

Page No.# 2/2

¶18

connection with Sivasagar P.S. Case No. 150/2026 registered u/s 117(2) and

¶19

109(1) of BNS.

¶20

The gist of the allegations in the FIR lodged by the brother-in-law of the victim is that on 28/7/26 in connection with some buying and preparation of meat, the petitioners assaulted him leading to serious injuries and undergoing treatment in ICU of Jorhat Medical College and fighting for life.

¶21

Mr. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits after perusal of the case diary that investigation has revealed that the nature of the assault was serious in manner leading to significant injuries and that the person is still undergoing treatment in the ICU, JMCH. It is revealed there from that the petitioner is also required to undergo brain surgery.

¶22

In view of such circumstances, it may not be justified to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and stands rejected at this stage.

¶23

Return the case diary.

¶24

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Ranjan Bordoloi and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Bordoloi and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases