Sri Amar Jyoti Neog v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge Full Bench of the Gauhati High Court considered an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 482 BNS, 2023. Rejecting the plea, the court held that the investigation was underway and the petitioner was a primary accused in an organised oil pilferage racket.
What did the court decide?
Pre-arrest anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNS, 2023 rejected and case diary returned.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010151872026
2026:GAU-AS:12439
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1669/2026
SRI AMAR JYOTI NEOG
S/O- SRI MUKESH NEOG R/O- TARAJAN GAON, BAREKURI BORGAON, MAKUM P.S.- BAREKURI DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN, MR SUBHRAJIT SAIKIA,MR. A HASAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant pre-arrest anticipatory bail to the petitioner during the pendency of investigation.
Whether the petitioner's ownership of the vehicle involved exonerates him of the charges.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Amar Jyoti Neog
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Pranjal Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/1669/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court