Partly allowed

Smti Nyabi Kakki v. The State of Ap

Gauhati HC17 Sept 2026AB/120/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A split bench granted the interim pre-arrest bail application filed by the accused-applicant. Upon hearing counsel reporting that the applicant had complied with prior directions to appear before the Investigating Officer and had cooperated with the investigation, the interim order dated 07.09.2026 was confirmed as absolute.

What did the court decide?

The interim pre-arrest bail order dated 07.09.2026 is made absolute; the anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

Smti Nyabi Kakki Vs The State of Ap — Quashing and FIR | Gauhati HC (2026)

¶1

Page No.# 1/2

¶2

GAHC040014522026

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

¶4

Case No. : AB/120/2026

¶5

Smti Nyabi Kakki

¶6

Wife of Shri Taman Mra, Daughter of Shri Monya Kakki, permanent resident of Sipu Village, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh 791102 and presently residing at Tanigium-Putum Colony/ Limeking Road, Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh 791122

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

The State of AP represented by the PP of AP

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : Jumgam Jini, Topuk Gocham,Tao Tarin,Binter Picha,Gyamar Jeevan,Isaac Kaji,Gegum Lollen,Taying Nega

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,

¶11

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 18.09.2026

¶14

Heard Mr. J. Jini, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accusedapplicant. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State.

¶15

This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant, apprehending arrest in connection

¶16

Page No.# 2/2

¶17

with Daporijo P.S. Case No. 64/2026, registered under Sections 316(4)/336(2)/314 /3(5) of BNS, 2023.

¶18

A coordinate bench of this Court, vide order dated 07.09.2026, has granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant with a direction to the accusedapplicant to appear before the Investigating Officer within ten (10) days and to cooperate with the investigation.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant submits that in terms of the aforesaid order dated 07.09.2026, the accused-applicant has already appeared before the Investigating Officer and got his statement recorded. He further submits that the accused-applicant is fully cooperating with the investigation and therefore, the interim order so passed should be made absolute.

¶20

Ms. Jini, learned Addl. P.P., also confirms that the accused-applicant has appeared before the Investigating Officer and is cooperating with the investigation.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid submissions and taking into account the fact that the accused-applicant is cooperating with the investigation, the interim order passed on 07.09.2026 is hereby made absolute.

¶22

In terms of the aforesaid direction, the instant anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

Miriam Degu (SPA)

Smti Nyabi Kakki v. The State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smti Nyabi Kakki v. The State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases