10. With regard to the third objection raised by the respondents pertaining to non-submission of the original bills by the petitioner Firm from the television channels in support of the amounts claimed by it, Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel, has submitted that the petitioner Firm had already submitted the original bills issued by the respective TV channels to the respondent authorities. However, an issue being raised in this connection, the petitioner, herein, had submitted certificates to that effect, from the concerned TV channels. Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel, has submitted that the said aspect of the matter, would be clear on a mere perusal of a Note, dated 10-02-2013, issued by the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Tourism Department, available in File No. TSM-155/2007/Pt., which goes to reveal that the copies of the bill submitted by the petitioner, were forwarded to the Government by the Director of Tourism, Assam, and thereafter, basing on a requirement made of the petitioner to furnish the certificates from the TV channels which had telecast the commercials produced by Sri Jahnu Barua; the certificates were so produced and incorporated in the File, in question. Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel, has also submitted that the certificates indicated in the said Note, were held to have been issued by the TV channels. Further, Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel, has submitted that it is under the said circumstances that the Secretary, Department of Tourism, had proceeded to approve for payment of the remaining dues of the petitioner. The learned counsel has, accordingly, submitted that the objections raised by the respondents, in the present proceeding, in this connection, would not be sustainable.
