The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution because the petitioners failed to appear for multiple occasions, indicating no interest in pursuing the case filed in 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010030292016
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6984/2016
SAMIRAN MOCHAHARY and 115 ORS.
S/O. SOLEMAN MOCHAHARY, ASSISTANT TEACHER, ENKORBARI M.E. SCHOOL, ENKORBARI, P.O. BENGTOL, PIN. 783385, P.S. RUNIKHATA, DIST. CHIRANG, B.T.C.
2: SRI SASLEN NARZARY
S/O. LT. AMSINGH NARZARY ASSTT. TEACHER OUGURI M.E. SCHOOL NO. 2 BENGTOL P.O. BENGTOL P.S. BASUGAON DIST. CHIRANG B.T.C.
S/O. LT. TILOK CH. BASUMATARY ASSTT. TEACHER ENKORBARI M.E. SCHOOL P.O. KAJALGAON PIN. 783385 DIST. CHIRANG B.T.C.
S/O. LT. GYANENDRA CHAMPARMARY ASSTT. TEACHER OUGURI M.E. SCHOOL NO. 2 BENGTOL P.O. BENGTOL P.S. RUNIKHATA
Page No.# 2/2
DIST. CHIRANG B.T.C
VERSUS
THE BOROLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL BTC and 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF BTC, EDUCATION DEPTT., KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN. 783375.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B B RABHA, MR.N N KARMAKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : , SC, BTC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
04.06.2025
None appears for the petitioners on call whereas Ms. R.B. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, BTC is present.
Even on the last occasion, i.e., 20.07.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
The matter is of the year 2016 and it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue with this case.
Accordingly, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Samiran Mochahary
Boroland Territorial Council
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
