Writ petition concerning the petitioner's claim against State authorities was rendered infructuous; counsel endorsed this to the court, which accordingly dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010024762023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/671/2023
DIPALI ROY
W/O- LT. PANCHANAN ROY, R/O- VILL- PAKHIRARHAT, P.O. RANIGANJ, P.S. SAPATGRAM, IN THE DISTRICT OF DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783345
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY, PIN- 781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING ASSAM HENGRABARI DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781036 3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (PHE) CHIEF ENGINEER (PHE) WATER ASSAM HENGRABARI DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781036 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DHUBRI DIVISION DHUBRI DIST.- DHUBRI
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM PIN- 783301 5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781029 6:THE DIRECTOR PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781006 7:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KALITA, MR. N M DAS,MR. J HATIMURIA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AG, SC, FINANCE,SC, P H E
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
ORDER
Date : 11.09.2025
Heard Mr. M. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. H. Baruah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P. Nayak, learned standing counsel appearing for the Finance Department.
Mr. M. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that in the meantime, the matter has become infructuous and accordingly makes an endorsement to the same effect.
In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dipali Roy
The State of Assam
The Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering Assam
The Superintending Engineer (PHE)
The Executive Engineer Public Health Engineering Dhubri Division
The Accountant General (A and E) Assam
Kaushik Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
