Dismissed¶24

Jaydeep Nandi v. Oil India Limited and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC2 Jun 2025WP(C)/6084/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; seal cover procedure; ad-hoc promotion; pendency of Criminal Trial; rejection order dated 12.09.2024 by Chief General Manager (HRD), Oil India Limited; liberty to challenge rejection order; Oil India Limited respondents; Gauhati High Court; Kardak Ete, J.; WP(C)/6084/2024.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal permitted with liberty to challenge the order dated 12.09.2024 passed by the Chief General Manager (HRD), Oil India Limited; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶24

Jaydeep Nandi Vs Oil India Limited and 4 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010239282024

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/6084/2024

¶6

JAYDEEP NANDI

¶7

S/O- LT JAYANTA NANDI, RESIDENT OF STATION ROAD, KARIMGANJ, P.O. AND P.S. AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

OIL INDIA LIMITED AND 4 ORS A GOVT. OF INDIA UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DULIAJAN, DIST. DIBRUGARH, PIN- 786602, ASSAM

¶10

2:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (ELECTRICAL AND CATHODIC) PL HEAD OF THE DEPT. ELECTRICAL AND CATHODIC OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN- 786602 ASSAM 3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRD) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN- 786602 ASSAM 4:THE DIRECTOR (OPERATION) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN- 786602 ASSAM 5:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ES

¶11

Page No.# 2/3

¶12

IC AND DOR) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN- 786602 ASSA

¶13

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P CHOUDHURY, MS B DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, OIL,

¶14

BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Date : 03.06.2025.

¶17

Heard Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel having receipt of the order dated 12.09.2024, passed by the Chief General Manager (HRD), Oil India Limited whereby his prayer for ad-hoc promotion has been rejected, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to challenge the order dated 12.09.2024.

¶19

Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the Oil India Limited is present for all the respondents.

¶20

Having considered the prayer made in this writ petition for a direction to adopt seal cover procedure for consideration of the petitioner during the pendency of the Criminal Trial and seeking ad-hoc promotion which the respondents have already undertaken and by way of review of the seal cover procedure in respect

¶21

Page No.# 3/3

¶22

of the petitioner, the prayer for the ad-hoc promotion having been rejected, I am of the view that there is no surviving cause to be adjudicated.

¶23

Accordingly, the prayer of withdrawal is accepted.

¶24

The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant