Disposed¶26

Bandana Dutta v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC16 Sept 2025WP(C)/3560/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition WP(C)/3560/2025 (Bandana Dutta, M/S Pragjyotish Drugs, Dhubri) before the Gauhati High Court; Petitioner's claim of interest on delayed payment had been denied by the Respondent Authorities (Health & Family Welfare Dept., Director of Health Services, Directorate of Industries & Commerce, ASIDC, Finance Dept., Govt. of Assam) vide order dated 23.06.2025; petition closed on withdrawal with liberty to re-approach the Court challenging the 23.06.2025 order; counsel: S. Borpatra Gohain (petitioner); D. Bora, S. Das and U. Das, Addl. Sr. GA (respondents).

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed on withdrawal, with liberty to the Petitioner to file afresh challenging the order dated 23.06.2025. ¶26

Bandana Dutta Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010137662025

2025:GAU-AS:12821

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/3560/2025

¶6

BANDANA DUTTA

¶7

M/S PRAGJYOTISH DRUGS, GAURIPUR, MASTERPARA, DHUBRI, W/OHABUL DUTTA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783331.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

¶10

REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, DISPUR-06, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

¶11

2:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-06.

¶12

3:THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE GUWAHATI-21.

¶13

4:THE DIRECTOR

¶14

ASSAM SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (ASIDC) BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21.

¶15

5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR-06 GUWAHATI ASSA

¶16

Page No.# 2/2

¶17

For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. S. Borpatra Gohain, Advocate

¶18

For the Respondent(s) : Ms. D. Bora, Advocate

¶19

: Mr. S. Das, Advocate

¶20

: Ms. U. Das, Addl. Sr. GA, Assam

¶21

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Date : 17.09.2025

¶24

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner had submitted a representation before the Respondent Authorities claiming interest on the delayed payment. However, vide an order dated 23.06.2025, the claim of the interest was denied.

¶25

The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the said order dated 23.06.2025 is required to be challenged taking into account that without a challenge being made, the present proceedings cannot be proceeded with. The learned counsel therefore submitted that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to file afresh thereby challenging the order dated 23.06.2025.

¶26

Taking into account the said submission, this Court therefore closes the instant writ petition on withdrawal.

¶27

Liberty however is given to the Petitioner to again approach this Court by challenging the order dated 23.06.2025.

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Bandana Dutta v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bandana Dutta v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Utpal Baishya Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

M/S Unique Traders Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Union of India and 3 Ors. Vs Kamalesh Surana

Mahbubur Rahman Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Rajib Haque Vs M/S Vivek Transport Agency

Fazlur Rahman Vs Sri Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma and Ors.