Hearing of a writ petition filed for withdrawal with liberty to file afresh, where the High Court dismissed the petition on withdrawal pursuant to submissions by both counsels.
The writ petition was dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010011112025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/325/2025
DULAL CHANDRA MECH
S/O LATE LOKESWAR MECH, R/O B ITAVATA ROAD, P.O.-DIGBOI, DISTTINSUKIA, ASSAM-786171
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI-110001
2:PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX HAVING OFFICE AT MILAN NAGAR LANE F P.O.- CR BUILDING DIBRUAGRH-786003
3:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX CENTRAL GST DIVISION TINSUKIA HAVING OFFICE AT DURGABARI ROAD TINSUKIA-78612
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J D ROY, MS M NIROLA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, GST
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 05-05-2025
Ms. M. Nirola, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel representing Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, GST are present.
Ms. Nirola, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh.
Mr. Jain has submitted that he has no objection to the said prayer.
In view of the above submission made by Ms. Nirola, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dulal Chandra Mech
The Union of India and 2 ORS
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
