Disposed¶28

Kamardeen Oaladeji Oladimeji v. the Union of India and Anr.

Gauhati HC15 Jul 2025WP(C)/2207/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court DB order dated 16.07.2025 in WP(C)/2207/2025 (Kamardeen Oaladeji Oladimeji v. Union of India & Anr.); deportation of Nigerian national; detention at Transit Camp, Matia, Goalpara, Assam; FRRO Kolkata stance that it has no role once a deportation order is issued; Ministry of External Affairs instructions awaited; writ petition closed as nothing further survives; liberty to re-approach Court if deportation has not taken place; neutral citation printed as 2025:GAU-AS:9171- (DB); internal reference GAHC010080712025.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed as nothing further survived, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court again if the deportation has not taken place. ¶28

Kamardeen Oaladeji Oladimeji Vs the Union of India and Anr. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010080712025

2025:GAU-AS:9171-

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶6

Case No. : WP(C)/2207/2025

¶7

KAMARDEEN OALADEJI OLADIMEJI

¶8

S/O AIHAJI RAHEEM OLADEJI, A CITIZEN OF NIGERIA, PRESENTLY DETAINED AT THE TRANSIT CAMP, MATIA, GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN 783125

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

¶11

REP BY THE SECRCETARY TO THE GOVT. INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. PIN 110001

¶12

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶13

REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPT. DISPUR

¶14

GUWAHATI- 781006

¶15

3:THE MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

¶16

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (MEA) SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-11001

¶17

Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, MR. D K AGARWALA,A BORBHUYAN

¶18

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR M R ADHIKARI,GA, ASSAM

¶19

Page No.# 2/3

¶20

BEFORE

¶21

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

ORDER

16.07.2025

(K.R. Surana, J)

Heard Mr. C. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. K. Agarwala, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. R. Adhikari, learned CGC appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2.

¶26

Mr. C. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. K. Agarwala, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the last order dated 26.06.2025 wherein the learned counsel holding the brief had submitted that as per information received by him, the petitioner has already reached his home.

¶27

Mr. M. R. Adhikari, learned CGC, has submitted that as per instructions from the FRRO, Kolkata, once a deportation order is issued, they have no role to play. However, he has submitted that he is yet to receive appropriate instructions from the Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India.

¶28

As the learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that as per instructions received by them the petitioner has already reached his home, the Court is of the considered opinion that noting further survives in this writ petition. Accordingly, the matter stands closed.

¶29

As the matter has been closed without appropriate instructions from the

¶30

Page No.# 3/3

¶31

Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India, we grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again in the event, the deportation has not taken place.

¶32

JUDGE JUDGE

¶33

Comparing Assistant

Kamardeen Oaladeji Oladimeji v. the Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamardeen Oaladeji Oladimeji v. the Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Subur Vs Union of India and 9 Ors.

Morjina Begum @ Marjina Khatun Vs the Union of India and 5 Ors.

Tupe Subhash Vs the Union of India and 4 Ors.

Bakkar Ali Vs the Union of India and 6 Ors.

MD Mazid Ali Vs the Union of India and Othrs

Asma Khatun Vs the Commissioner and Secretary and 3 Ors.