Monuj Biswas v. the Union of India and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court declined to interfere with transfer order of a CRPF officer despite pending voluntary retirement application, noting voluntary retirement requires acceptance and transfer remains a condition of service in disciplined forces.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; interim order vacated; petitioner given extended time to join as per rules from 03.06.2025.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC010087882025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2204/2025
MONUJ BISWAS
S/O. MAHINDRA BISWAS, PRESENTLY SERVING AT CIAT-SLR, COUNTER INSURGENCY AND ANTI TERRORISM, SCHOOL, CRPF DOYAPORE, UDHARBAND, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788030.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI110003.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CENTRAL GOVT. OFFICE COMPLEX NEW DELHI-110001.
3:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether transfer is a condition of service in a disciplined force preventing the petitioner from seeking voluntary retirement pending acceptance by authorities.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Monuj Biswas
- respondent
The Union of India
Coram
Soumitra Saikia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/2204/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court