Disposed¶36

Smti. Temsurenla Longchar v. Shri C. Mangyang Jamir

Gauhati HC16 Jul 2025C. REVN/2/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Custody; interim custody order dated 19.12.2024; civil revision C. REVN No. 2/2025; Gauhati High Court Kohima Bench; Shamima Jahan, J.; Nagaland; Principal Judge, Family Court, Dimapur; Custody Case No. 7/2023; settlement between mother and father; three children; custody with father till majority; mother's alternate and consecutive weekend access; I.A (Civil) 59/2025 allowed; no collusion or coercion; infructuous; petition disposed of; caveat discharged; welfare of children; neutral citation 2025:GAU-NL:301.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed/disposed of as infructuous in view of the settlement between the parties and the order dated 19.06.2025 in Custody Case No. 7/2023; caveat discharged. ¶36

Smti. Temsurenla Longchar Vs Shri C. Mangyang Jamir — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC020002322025

2025:GAU-NL:301

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH

¶5

Case No. : C. REVN/2/2025

¶6

SMTI. TEMSURENLA LONGCHAR D/O SHRI IMNA LONGCHAR, R/O H.NO. FD-20, FOREST DEPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, FOREST COLONY, DIMAPUR NAGALAND-797112

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

SHRI C. MANGYANG JAMIR

¶9

S/O SHRI I. CHUBA JAMIR, R/O H.NO. 168, NAHARBARI, DIMAPUR797112, NAGALAND

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : C. T. JAMIR, SR. ADV, O TEMJEN JAMIR,JAWAMONG YADEN,IMTILA PONGEN,NUNGSANG AIER,KROVI TSUKRU,TOSHI JAMIR,ASA RUTSA,ALIBA OZUKUM,I IMCHEN

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : SENTIYANGER,

¶12

BEFORE

¶13

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Date : 17.07.2025

¶16

Heard Ms. Jawamong Yaden, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.

¶17

Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the respondent. The counsel appearing for

¶18

Page No.# 2/3

¶19

the petitioner has placed a Judgment dated 19.06.2025 passed by the

¶20

Principal Judge, Family Court, Dimapur, Nagaland by which, the Custody Case

¶21

No. 7/2023 was disposed of by virtue of a settlement arrived between the

¶22

parties i.e., the mother and the father of the three (3) children. The operative part of the said Judgment is reproduced below:-

¶23

“I have examined the parties generally and found that both parties have clearly understood the terms and conditions of the agreement.

¶24

In this regard, the mother/second party has expressed her apprehension regarding third party interference. It is made clear to both the parties that as the father and mother they are the primary guardians and their agreement dated 19.06.2025 concern the welfare of their 3 (three) children.

¶25

Therefore, both parties shall endeavor to make sure that the custody agreement that they have arrived at this time is honored and complied with trust and open communication.

¶26

Thus, upon satisfaction as to the veracity of the agreement arrived at between the parties dated 19.06.2025, and that there is no collusion or coercion in the execution of the agreement, this I.A (Civil) 59/2025 stands allowed and Custody case No. 07/2023 stands disposed as settled along with I.A (Civil) case no. 59/2025.

¶27

Furnish copy of the order to both parties.”

¶28

2. The instant application i.e., C.REVN No. 2/2025 has been filed against

¶29

an Order dated 19.12.2024 by which an interim custody of the children was allowed to the father i.e., the sole respondent. However, during the pendency of the same, the parties have entered into a settlement to the effect that the

¶30

custody of all the three (3) children is handed over to the father till they

¶31

attain majority and that the mother was allowed to have custody of the

¶32

Page No.# 3/3

¶33

children on alternate weekends, every month and also to have custody on consecutive weekends.

¶34

3. On the said agreement being reached between the parties, the main Custody Case No. 7/2023 was disposed of vide order dated 19.06.2025 as stated above. The counsels appearing for both the parties have stated that in view of the said order, the present case may also be closed since the same has become infructuous.

¶35

4. It is noticed that for the welfare of the three (3) children, the parties have entered into an agreement and the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Dimapur, Nagaland has also directed both the parties to adhere strictly to the agreement and to execute the same without any interference from any third party. In view of the order passed in Custody Case No. 7/2023 dated 19.06.2025, this petition stands closed.

¶36

5. Petition is disposed of. The Caveat also stands discharged.

¶37

JUDGE

¶38

Comparing Assistant

Smti. Temsurenla Longchar v. Shri C. Mangyang Jamir

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smti. Temsurenla Longchar v. Shri C. Mangyang Jamir

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Keyileugongbe Vs the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Moatemsu. a. Jamir Vs the State of Nagaland and 3 Ors.

Bendangmeren Vs the State of Nagaland and 3 Ors.

Smti. Neitsolo-U Vs the State of Nagaland and 4 Ors.

Amram S Arkha Vs State of Nagaland

Leyalo Kath Vs State of Nagaland