Interlocutory application seeking condonation of a 16-day delay in filing a connected civil revision petition. The court found the delay circumstantial rather than deliberate, condoned it, and disposed of the application.
Delay of 16 days in filing CRP No. 29/2025 condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040004792025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/87/2025
Talok Kamdong
Son of Situ Kamdong, resident of Purying Village, PO and PS Mechuka, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh. 791003
VERSUS
Damling Pusang and 5 Ors Son of Late Tapu Pusang, resident of Purying Village, PO and PS Mechuka, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:Maling Koje Age: 52 Occupation : Son of Late Porme Koje resident of Rapum Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Tabi Puchung Age: 50 Occupation : Son of Late Timpu Puchung resident of Hiri Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Tame Pupor Age: 50 Occupation : Son of Late Pudik Puyor resident of Rapum PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District
Page No.# 2/3
Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Boka Kodung Age: 40 Occupation : Son of Late Tame Kodung resident of Rapum Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Nyadur Puyom Age: 52 Occupation : Son of Late Ronya Puyor resident of Lipusi Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Aruna Rai,
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 29.05.2025
The petitioner has filed an affidavit after effecting service of notice upon the respondent nos. 1 to 6 by way of Dasti mode. Accordingly, service of notice upon the respondent nos. 1 to 6 is deemed to be complete.
The present Interlocutory application has been instituted, praying for condonation of delay of 16 days in filing the connected civil revision petition being CRP No. 29/2025.
I have heard Mr. R. Ingo, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Also perused the contentions made in the application.
Page No.# 3/3
On perusal of the reasons asserted by the applicant in the Interlocutory application, I am of the considered view that the delay of 16 days occasioned in filing the connected civil revision petition is not deliberate but, is circumstantial. Accordingly, considering the averments made in the Interlocutory application, I am of the view that the said delay is required to be condoned. Hence, the delay of 16 days occasioning in filing the connected civil revision petition stands condoned.
In view of the above, the instant Interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 16-day delay in filing CRP No. 29/2025 should be condoned.
Talok Kamdong
Damling Pusang and 5 Ors
Maling Koje
Tabi Puchung
Tame Pupor
Boka Kodung
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
