Disposed

Paplu Gope v. Md. Inam Waris and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC1 Jun 2025CRP(IO)/202/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file applications for substitution of legal heirs and condonation of delay, citing inadvertence. The court excluded the period of pendency from the limitation calculation and directed the trial court to consider the applications fresh, vacating a stay order.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file applications; petition disposed of with directions to trial court.

Paplu Gope Vs Md. Inam Waris and 4 Ors. — Partition | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/6

GAHC010172162022

2025:GAU-AS:7158

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : CRP(IO)/202/2022

¶6

PAPLU GOPE W/O- LATE MANIK GOPE, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 3, RAMKRISHNA PALLY, P.O.- RANGAPARA, P.S.- RANGAPARA, DIST.- SONITPUR, TEZPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784505.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

MD. INAM WARIS AND 4 ORS S/O LATE ASHIK ANSARI, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NAHARANI TEA ESTATE, P.O.- RANGAPARA, P.S.- RANGAPARA, DIST.- SONITPUR, TEZPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784505. THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 IS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE- NAWADA, P.O. NAWADA VIA MASRAK, DIST- CHAPRA, BIHAR, PIN- 841417.

¶9

2:MD. TAKLU WARIS S/O LATE ASHIK ANSARI

¶10

PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NAHARANI TEA ESTATE

P.O.- RANGAPARA

P.S.- RANGAPARA

Page No.# 2/6

DIST.- SONITPUR TEZPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 IS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE- NAWADA P.O. NAWADA VIA MASRAK DIST- CHAPRA BIHAR PIN- 841417. 3:MD. MAZAHAR WARIS S/O LATE ASHIK ANSARI

¶15

PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NAHARANI TEA ESTATE P.O.- RANGAPARA

¶16

P.S.- RANGAPARA DIST.- SONITPUR TEZPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 IS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE- NAWADA P.O. NAWADA VIA MASRAK DIST- CHAPRA BIHAR PIN- 841417.

¶17

4:MD. RAHMAN ANSARI S/O LATE ASHIK ANSARI

¶18

PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NAHARANI TEA ESTATE P.O.- RANGAPARA P.S.- RANGAPARA DIST.- SONITPUR TEZPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505. THE RESPONDENT NO. 4 IS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE- NAWADA

¶19

Page No.# 3/6

¶20

P.O. NAWADA VIA MASRAK DIST- CHAPRA BIHAR PIN- 841417.

¶21

5:MD. IKBAL ANSARI S/O LATE ASHIK ANSARI

¶22

PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NAHARANI TEA ESTATE P.O.- RANGAPARA P.S.- RANGAPARA

¶23

DIST.- SONITPUR TEZPUR ASSAM PIN- 784505

¶24

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.R. Shome, Advocate

¶25

For the Respondent(s) : None appears

¶26

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Date : 02.06.2025

¶29

Heard Mr. A.R. Shome, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶30

The supervisory jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked challenging the order dated 29.07.2022 passed by the learned Court of the Civil Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur in Petition No. 1502/2022 dated 31.05.2022 arising out of Title Suit No. 07/2019.

¶31

Page No.# 4/6

¶32

Mr. A.R. Shome, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there was an inadvertence on the part of the petitioner not to file an application under Order XXII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “the Code”) as well as Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 along with the application filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code. The learned counsel submitted that this inadvertence happened on account of the ground that the petitioner was not aware of the date of death of the defendant No. 2. He therefore submitted that taking into account the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Om Prakash Gupta @ Lalloowa (Now Deceased) & Ors. Vs. Satish Chandra (Now Deceased) reported in (2025) SCC OnLine SC 291, the petitioner would be well advised to file a proper application before the learned Trial Court and the learned Trial Court may be directed to consider the same. He further submitted that the period during which the instant proceedings have been pending be excluded while computing the period of limitation in filing the said application.

¶33

This Court has given a due consideration to the materials on record and has also heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. It is also seen that the respondents are not represented.

¶34

Taking into account the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, this Court closes the

¶35

Page No.# 5/6

¶36

instant proceedings thereby giving liberty to the petitioner to file an application under Order XXII Rule 9 of the Code as well as Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay before the learned Trial Court.

¶37

This Court further observes that the period from 24.08.2022 till date be excluded while computing the period of limitation in filing the application under Order XXII Rule 9 of the Code. This Court further restores the Petition No. 1502/2022 dated 31.05.2022, taking into account that the same would be required for the purpose of substitution of the legal heirs of the defendant No. 2.

¶38

This Court further directs the learned Trial Court i.e. the learned Court of the Civil Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur to consider the 3 (three) applications without being influenced by the order dated 29.07.2022, taking into account the settled position of law as held by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Sardar Amarjit Singh Kalra (Dead) By Lrs. & Others Vs. Pramod Gupta (Smt) (Dead) by Lrs. and Others reported in (2003) 3 SCC 272 wherein the Supreme Court observed that the provisions of Order XXII of the Code are for the purpose of continuation of the proceedings.

¶39

It is further seen that vide an order dated 26.08.2022, the further proceedings of Title Suit No. 07/2019 pending before the learned Court of the Civil Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur was stayed. The said stay

¶40

Page No.# 6/6

¶41

order is vacated and the parties herein are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court i.e. the learned Court of the Civil Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur on 27.06.2025 for further proceedings of Title Suit No 07/2019.

¶42

With the above observations and directions, the instant petition stands disposed of.

¶43

JUDGE

¶44

Comparing Assistant

Paplu Gope v. Md. Inam Waris and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paplu Gope v. Md. Inam Waris and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pranab Ranjan Bhuiya Vs Ashit Ranjan Bhuiya

Pranab Ranjan Bhuiya Vs Ashit Ranjan Bhuiya

National Insurance Company Limited Vs Sayed Ali and Anr.

Smt. Seema Ghosh Vs Ishit Ghosh

Narjida Khatun Sultana Vs Anowar Uddin Ahmed

Sri Ratanlal Agarwalla and Anr. Vs Smti Sashi Devi Jalan