Tapir Mengu v. Otin Mengu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Article 227 seeking permission to file a delayed reply/objection before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pasighat. The High Court held that the reply was required to adjudicate the appeal and allowed it.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040014792024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : CRP/47/2024
Tapir Mengu
Son of Late Ojing Mengu, resident of Sibo Village, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Otin Mengu
Son of Late Okep, resident of Mongku Village, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Orin Modi, Pura Khongkhung,Jobang Modi,Noni Nobeng
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, whose reply/objection was rejected for inordinate delay in Civil Appeal No. 68/2023, should be permitted to file the reply/objection in the interest of justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tapir Mengu
- respondent
Otin Mengu
Coram
Yarenjungla Longkumer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/47/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court