One-line dismissal order: a criminal revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on consecutive listings, including one marked 'For Dismissal'. Decides nothing of general application.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's non-representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010007062011
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./269/2011
SUREN CH. RAJA
S/O SRI NAREN RAJA R/O VILL- SRI JAJORI SHIMOLUTAL P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
SMTI RUMI RAJA HAZARIKA and ANR W/O SRI SUREN RAJA D/O SRI BHOGESWAR HAZARIKA R/O VILLKUJISATRA, P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM.
2:THE STATE OF ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M BHATTACHARYA, MS.M MAHANTA,MR.A R MEDHI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. S BISWAS,MR. S BISWAS (LEGAL AID COUNSEL)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
ORDER
19.03.2025
Ms. D. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Biswas, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. M.B. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent are present.
Page No.# 2/2
It appears that this matter was listed today in the order column with the remark “For Dismissal”. As on the last occasion, i.e. 13.03.2025 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
In view of the consecutive no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being listed in the cause list with the remark “For Dismissal”, the petition stands dismissed, for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Suren Ch. Raja
Smti Rumi Raja Hazarika
The State of Assam
Kaushik Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
