Abdul Jabbar and Anr. v. Farida Yasmin
Case brief
What is this about?
The court noted the petitioners' desire to exercise their right to be heard before the Magistrate under Section 223 BNSS, 2023. Consequently, the criminal petition was closed with liberty reserved for the petitioners to exhaust this statutory remedy before the Judicial Magistrate First Class.
What did the court decide?
Liberty reserved to exhaust statutory remedy under Section 223 BNSS, 2023.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010174782025
2025:GAU-AS:10559
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./957/2025
ABDUL JABBAR AND ANR S/O LATE AJIMUDDIN R/O VILL AND P.O. GHANSHIMULI, P.S. KHARUPETIA, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN-784115.
2: ANOWARA B EGUM W/O ABDUL JABBAR R/O VILL AND P.O. GHANSHIMULI P.S. KHARUPETIA DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN-78411
VERSUS
FARIDA YASMIN W/O LATE RAHIMUDDIN AHMED R/O B-1 KALPANA TILAK RESIDENCE, BISHNU RABHA PATH, KERAKUCHI, GUWAHATI, P.O. SAWKUCHI, P.S. BASISTHA, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781040.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S MUKTAR, MR A N IQBAL,MR. S RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be permitted to exhaust the statutory remedy of being heard before the Judicial Magistrate under Section 223 BNSS, 2023?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ABDUL JABBAR
- petitioner
ANOWARA B EGUM
- respondent
FARIDA YASMIN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- Crl.Pet./957/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court