Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal petition to file it afresh citing technical reasons; the court allowed the prayer and disposed of the petition on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010210722024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./1259/2024
ASHISH SAHA
S/O ANANTA KR. SAHA, R/O VILL- JHARPARA PART II, P.S.-ABHAYAPURI, DIST- BONGAIGAON (ASSAM)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:KANIKA RAY D/O LT. BALENDRA CH. RAY R/O ABHAYAPURI WARD NO. 3 P.S.- ABHAYAPURI DIST- BONGAIGAON (ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : A W AMAN, ISHANI SHOME,SAMIM RAHMAN,MS SURAYA RAHMAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
:: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
O R D E R
12.03.2025
Heard the learned counsel Mr. S. Nawaz appearing on behalf of the petitioner who submits that he wants to withdraw this criminal petition for now and intends to file it afresh because of some technical reasons.
I have also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.
The prayer of Mr. Nawaz is allowed.
The Criminal Petition is disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ashish Saha
The State of Assam represented by the Public Prosecutor
Kanika Ray
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
