Disposed

Amulya Kumar Goswami v. Prabason Chakraborty

Gauhati HC5 Jan 2025Cont.Cas(C)/321/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition regarding non-payment of gratuity and retirement benefits. After the Supreme Court's order dated 16.01.2023 and the respondent's disbursement of the benefits, the court closed the contempt proceedings as substantially complied with, reserving liberty on the date of retirement issue.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; liberty reserved to petitioner on the issue of date of retirement.

Amulya Kumar Goswami Vs Prabason Chakraborty — Contempt of Court | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010133462021

2025:GAU-AS:170-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/321/2021

¶6

AMULYA KUMAR GOSWAMI

¶7

S/O ANANDA GOSWAMI, R/O VILL AND P.O.-PATACHARKUCHI, DISTBARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781329

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

PRABASON CHAKRABORTY

¶10

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI-22

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR, Y SULTANA,MR H BEZBARUA,MRS P RAI

¶12

Advocate for the Respondent : MS N BEGUM, MR S GAUTAM

¶13

BEFORE

¶14

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

¶15

ORDER

¶16

06.01.2025

¶17

Heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Gautam, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶18

A copy of the order dated 16.01.2023 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal no. _______ of 2023 [the Indian Institute of Bank Management and others vs.

¶19

Page No.# 2/2

¶20

Amulya Kumar Goswami etc.] arising out of SLP [Civil] nos. 20347-20348 of 2021 has been placed on record, which is marked as Document-‘X’.

¶21

Mr. Gautam, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that on 10.02.2023, the Indian Institute of Bank Management has disbursed the gratuity and other retirement benefits to the petitioner and has placed a copy of the said Letter bearing no. 07.05/839/2022-23, which is marked as Document-‘Y’.

¶22

Mr. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has received the amounts mentioned in the Letter dated 10.02.2023 towards retirement benefits. He has further submitted that as there is an issue regarding the date of retirement of the petitioner, liberty may be reserved to the petitioner on the said issue, by closing this contempt petition.

¶23

In view of the above, the contempt petition stands closed as it transpires that the direction made in the order dated 16.01.2023 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been substantially complied with. Liberty, however, stands reserved to the petitioner on the issue of the date of retirement.

¶24

Comparing Assistant

Amulya Kumar Goswami v. Prabason Chakraborty

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amulya Kumar Goswami v. Prabason Chakraborty

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheuly Laskar Vs Sanjib Kumar Bhuyan and Anr.

M/S Oasis Enterprises Vs Smt. Ranjana Gupta

M/S. J. Deep Chemicals and Fertilizers Vs P.N.Das, Acs and Anr.

Dilip Hazarika Vs Anuradha Adhikari Sharma and 3 Ors.

M/S. Green Valley Industry Vs Nazrul Islam and Ors.

Dipali Roy Barman @ Jaya Barman Vs Dibakar Nath, IAS and 2 Ors.

Gobin Bora Vs Varshaty Das and 4 Ors.

Mint Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Vinod Roy and 3 Ors.

Rokibul Islam Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

R. S. J L Daniel Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Ravikant Yadav Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.

On the Death of Bijan Lal Choudhury His Wife Rekha Choudhury Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Akbar Ali Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.