Sitaram Kanoo AND17 Ors. Vs Nisarg Hivarea IAS

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 15: SAJNA BEGUM LASKAR BARBHUYAN D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 16: MOINUL HOQUE LASKAR S/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶36

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II

¶37

Page No.# 4/9

¶38

PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM

¶39

17: PIYARA BEGUM LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶40

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM

¶41

18: SUPIYA BEGUM LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶42

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSA

¶43

VERSUS

¶44

NISARG HIVAREA IAS DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY, HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 788151

¶45

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B RAHMAN,

¶46

Advocate for the Respondent : ,

¶47

Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/228/2025

¶48

SITARAM KANOO AND 17 OTHERS S/O LATE SIBA PRASAD KANOO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM

¶49

2: KESHAB PRASAD KANU

¶50

Page No.# 5/9

¶51

S/O SRIPRASHAD KANU

¶52

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3: MIRA KANU D/O LATE BRAJARANGI KANU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4: SUBODH KANU S/O LATE PUJAN KANU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5: PRATIMA KANU D/O LATE PUJAN KANU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6: BIDYA SAGAR KANU S/O LATE PUJAN KANU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7: RAJEN KANU S/O BRAJARANGI KANU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 8: PRATAP DAS

¶53

Page No.# 6/9

¶54

S/O LATE RANJIT DAS

¶55

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 9: RAJU DAS S/O LATE RANJIT DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 10: TAHAMIN BAHAR CHOUDHURY @ LASKAR W/O ALI AHMED LASKAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 11: SAMSUL HAQUE LASKAR S/O ALI AHMED LASKAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 12: NUR NEHAR LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 13: NUR JAHAN LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶56

Page No.# 7/9

¶57

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 14: MINARA BEGUM LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶58

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM

¶59

15: SAJNA BEGUM LASKAR BARBHUYAN D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶60

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 16: MOINUL HOQUE LASKAR S/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶61

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 17: PIYARA BEGUM LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶62

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM 18: SUPIYA BEGUM LASKAR D/O ALI AHMED LASKAR

¶63

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PALOICHERRA PART II PO SULTANICHERRA DIST HAILAKANDI

¶64

Page No.# 8/9

¶65

ASSAM VERSUS NISARG HIVAREA IAS DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151

¶66

-----------Advocate for : MR. B RAHMAN Advocate for : appearing for NISARG HIVAREA IAS

¶67

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

¶68

ORDER

¶69

Date : 14-11-2025

¶70

Heard Mr. B. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicants-contempt petitioners.

¶71

The applicants-contempt petitioners have preferred the accompanying contempt petition, Cont.Case [C] no. 228/2025 alleging violation of the direction made in an Order dated 06.12.2024 passed in a writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 6487/2024.

¶72

The instant application is preferred by the applicants-contempt petitioners seeking impleadment of the following party –

¶73

‘Abhishek Jain,

¶74

District Commissioner-cum-Competent Authority,

¶75

Hailakandi, District – Hailakandi, Assam, PIN – 788151’

¶76

Page No.# 9/9

¶77

-as party-respondent no. 2 in the accompanying contempt petition, Cont.Case [C] no. 228/2025.

¶78

It is averred that after filing of the contempt petition, the respondent who was impleaded in Cont.Case [C] no. 228/2025, has since been transferred from the office of the District Commissioner and in his place, the proposed respondent has joined in the meantime. The Order dated 06.12.2024 has also been brought to the notice of the proposed party respondent on 11.09.2025.

¶79

Having gone through the statements and averments made in the aforestated manner, this Court is of the considered view that the proposed party respondent is a necessary party for adjudication of the issues involved in the connected contempt petition. Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed.

¶80

The learned counsel for the applicants-contempt petitioners shall file an amended cause-title in terms of the Notification no. 79 dated 19.06.2023 before the Registry within 3 [three] working days from today and on submission of the amended Cause-Title, the Registry shall do the necessary corrections in the Cause-Title of the contempt petition as well as in the CIS and thereafter, list the contempt petition for admission for issuance of notice to the newly impleaded party respondent no. 2.

¶81

JUDGE

¶82

Comparing Assistant

Sitaram Kanoo AND17 Ors. v. Nisarg Hivarea IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sitaram Kanoo AND17 Ors. v. Nisarg Hivarea IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mausumi De Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Kamila Bibi Vs the Deputy Commissioner Cum District Magistrate and Ors.

M/S Royal Coal Products and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and 13 Ors.

Sri Nityananda Kaman Vs the State of Assam and Others

Rakesh Biswas Vs the Banking Ombudsman, Reserve Bank of India and 5 Ors.

Jyotish Chandra Das Vs Gyanendra Dev Tripathi, IAS and 3 Ors.