Allowed¶32

Sri Madhuram Boruah v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC5 Jun 2025I.A.(Civil)/1665/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court; Justice Kardak Ete; I.A.(Civil)/1665/2025; order dated 06.06.2025; impleadment of party; necessary party; Deputy Commissioner Lakhimpur; connected writ petition WP(C) 7256/2023; Sri Madhuram Boruah; State of Assam; PWD (Roads); Department of School Education (Secondary); application allowed and disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur as respondent No.7 in the connected writ petition WP(C) 7256/2023; the I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. ¶32

Sri Madhuram Boruah Vs the State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010109982025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1665/2025

¶6

SRI MADHURAM BORUAH

¶7

SON OF LATE PRADIP BORUAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHENUKHANA SIRINGAON, P.O. AND P.S.- BATMARI, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 787053.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶10

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS), GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006

¶11

2:THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM CUM CHAIRPERSON OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE

¶12

DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECONDARY)

¶13

DISPUR

¶14

GUWAHATI- 781006.

¶15

3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003.

¶16

4:THE ADDL. CHIEF ENGINEER (PLANNING) PWD (ROADS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI ASSAM

¶17

PIN- 781003.

¶18

Page No.# 2/3

¶19

5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD(ROADS) LAKHIMPUR STATE ROAD DIVISION GHILAMARA ASSAM PIN- 787053. 6:THE ADDL. CHIEF ENGINEER PWD(P) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781003. 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 78700

¶20

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR U SAIKIA, MR. Z ISLAM

¶21

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, SEC. EDU.

¶22

BEFORE

¶23

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Date : 06.06.2025

¶26

Heard Mr. U. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Das, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/Respondent No.2.

¶27

By filing this application, the petitioner has prayed for impleadment of Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur as party respondent No.7 in the connected WP(C) 7256/2023.

¶28

Having considered the grounds for impleadment of Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur and the prayer not being objected to by the learned counsel for the Opposite

¶29

Page No.# 3/3

¶30

Party, I deem it appropriate to allow this application, as for proper adjudication of the connected writ petition, the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur appears to be a necessary party.

¶31

Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No.7 in the connected writ petition.

¶32

Accordingly, the I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

Comparing Assistant

Sri Madhuram Boruah v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Madhuram Boruah v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amarit Ch. Kalita Vs the Assam Apex Weaver and Artisans Co-Op. Federation Ltd.Artfed and Anr.

Sahara India Vs Bhabani Sharma

Pranab Jyoti Bora Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Manjil Hussain Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Dulal Saikia and 5 Ors. Vs Niren Baishya and Anr.

Altaf Hussain Vs the State of Assam and 7 Ors.