Dismissed¶20

Taffazul Ali and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC13 Nov 2025Bail Appln./3529/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court, Bail Appln./3529/2025, decided 14.11.2025 by Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, J. Bail under Section 483 BNSS rejected in Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 252/2025, Sections 331(4)/305(a)/112(2) BNS 2023 (theft/burglary-related offences). Petitioners Taffazul Ali and Toibar Ali alleged to be purchasers of stolen items from M/s M.S. Infotech theft (total value approx. Rs. 5,18,713.64); recovery effected from petitioners; 38 days custody; bail refused on incriminating case-diary material and gravity of offence; case diary ordered to be sent back.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for bail is rejected, considering the incriminating material available in the case diary and the gravity of the offence. ¶20

Taffazul Ali and Anr. Vs the State of Assam — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010239292025

2025:GAU-AS:15429

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./3529/2025

¶6

TAFFAZUL ALI AND ANR SON OF AMIR ALI, VILLAGE- DUMURIA PART-I, P.S ABHAYAPURI, DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM.

¶7

2: TOIBAR ALI SON OF AMIR ALI VILL- DUMURIA PART-I P.S. ABHAYAPURI DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M AHMED, P. GHOSH,B DAS

¶9

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶10

BEFORE

¶11

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 14.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. M.I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P for the State.

¶14

Page No.# 2/3

¶15

This application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, seeking bail of the petitioners, namely, 1. Taffazul Ali, 2. Toibar Ali , who were arrested on 09.10.2025 in connection with Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 252/2025 under Sections 331(4)/305(a)/112(2) of BNS,20233.

¶16

One person namely Bhaskar Jyoti Singha, S/O Lt. Majedra Kumar Singha lodged an FIR with the Bongaigaon Police Station alleging inter-alia that on 2809-2025 at around approx 1:40 AM, some unknown miscreants broke into his shop namely M/s M.S. Infotech, located at Main Road Near AGP Office Bongaigaon Assam 783380 and had stolen Mobile Phones 4,13,798.64/(Including GST), Television 15450/-(Including GST), Laptop 79,375/-(Including GST), Accessories 5090/-(Including GST), Cash Rs. 5000 approx. Total approximate value of stolen goods is Rs.5,18,713.64/-

¶17

After receiving the FIR the Officer-in-Charge of Bongaigaon Police Station registered the FIR vide Bongaigaon P.S. case No. 252/2025 under section 31(4)/305(a)/112(2) of BNS and started investigation.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel that the petitioners have spent 38 days behind the custody and items have also been recovered and hence prayer for bail may be considered.

¶19

On the other hand learned Addl. P.P with reference to the case diary submits that the present petitioners are the purchasers of the stolen items and the same were recovered from them and the value of items amount to Rs. 05,18,713.64/-.

¶20

Considering the incriminating material available in the case diary and the gravity of the offence the prayer for bail stands rejected.

¶21

Page No.# 3/3

¶22

7. Send back the case diary.

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

Comparing Assistant

Taffazul Ali and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taffazul Ali and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samrat Kr Das Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Sri Dhrubajyoti Kakati Vs Smti Rijumani Kakati

Nripen Rabha Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Nurjamal Hoque @ Nur Jamal Sk Vs the State of Assam

Deep Roy Vs the State of Assam

Safikul Islam @ Safikul Ali Vs the State of Assam