Allowed

Hamidul Islam v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC16 Jun 2025Bail Appln./1968/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail applications under Section 483 BNSS for two accused arrested in connection with an alleged prostitution racket at a beauty parlour in Chirang. Considering their 28 days of judicial custody already undergone, the court allowed both applications and directed release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Both petitioners ordered to be released on bail of ₹20,000/- with sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Chirang, Kajalgaon.

Hamidul Islam Vs the State of Assam — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010129422025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./1962/2025

¶6

HASEN ALI MONDAL S/O ABUBAKKAR SIDDIQUE R/O VILL- BARTALOWA P.S. KAJALGAON DIST. CHIRANG, ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR A AHMED,MR. M A CHOUDHURY,U U KHAN

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶11

Linked Case : Bail Appln./1968/2025

¶12

HAMIDUL ISLAM S/O MIZAR UDDIN SHEIKH R/O VILL- KAWATIKA P.S. BIJNI DIST. CHIRANG ASSAM

¶13

Page No.# 2/3

¶14

VERSUS

¶15

THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP ASSAM

¶16

-----------Advocate for : MR. A AHMED Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶17

:: BEFORE ::

¶18

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

17.06.2025

¶21

Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶22

2. These applications are filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioners Hasen Ali Mondal & Hamidul Islam have prayed for releasing them on bail after they were arrested in connection with Kajalgaon P.S. Case No.78/2025.

¶23

3. One particular students organization had lodged an FIR before police alleging that these petitioners were involved in a act of prostitution run in a Beauty Parlour. They were allegedly beaten up and handed over to police.

¶24

4. Mr. Parasar has pressed for calling for the Case Diary.

¶25

5. Mr. Ahmed has submitted that both the petitioners have spent 28 days in judicial custody. According to Mr. Ahmed, considering their period of detention already undergone, the bail applications should be considered.

¶26

Page No.# 3/3

¶27

6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

¶28

7. Under the given circumstances, the period of detention already undergone by the petitioners deserve to be taken as a ground for releasing them on bail. Therefore, both the bail applications are allowed.

¶29

8. The petitioners Hasen Ali Mondal & Hamidul Islam, who were arrested in connection with Kajalgaon P.S. Case No.78/2025, shall be released on bail of ₹20,000/- with sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chirang, Kajalgaon.

¶30

With the aforesaid direction, both the bail applications are disposed of.

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

Comparing Assistant

Hamidul Islam v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hamidul Islam v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Moinul Hoque @ Law Vs the State of Assam

Sahajahan Ali Bepari Vs the State of Assam

Nur Islam @ Kalia Vs the State of Assam

Ali Akbar Alias Alu Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Jamidul Sk Alias Islam Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Hasen Ali Mondal Vs the State of Assam