Tayo Tallom Rending v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC7 May 2025AB/454/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory/pre-arrest bail; Section 482 BNSS 2023; Jonai P.S. Case No. 162/2021; Sections 120(B)/420/468/471/406 IPC; interim bail dated 10.03.2025 made absolute; custodial interrogation not necessary; co-operation with Investigating Officer; GST documents submitted; F.I.R.-named accused Chibang Pal charge-sheeted; petitioner not F.I.R.-named accused; Tayo Tallom Rending; M/s Tayo Enterprises; Naharlagun, Papumpare, Arunachal Pradesh; State of Assam; Gauhati High Court; Mitali Thakuria, J.; neutral citation 2025:GAU-AS:5701.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail made absolute in the same terms and conditions as the interim pre-arrest bail order dated 10.03.2025; Case Diary to be sent back. ¶¶25

Tayo Tallom Rending Vs the State of Assam — Anticipatory Bail | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010040352025

2025:GAU-AS:5701

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/454/2025

¶6

TAYO TALLOM RENDING S/O- TAYO TANI,

¶7

PROP. OF M/S TAYO ENTERPRISES, R/O- FLAT NO-03, BARAPANI BAZAR, NH-52A, NAHARLAGUN , DIST- PAPUMPARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP. ASSAM

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS A GOGOI, MR G PHUKAN

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶12

BEFORE

¶13

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Date : 08.05.2025

¶16

Heard Mr. G. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶17

Page No.# 2/3

¶18

This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioners, who are apprehending arrest in connection with Jonai P.S. Case No. 162/2021, under Sections 120(B)/420/468/471/406 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

Case Diary has been received and I have perused the same.

¶20

It is submitted by Mr. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner, that after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail on 10.03.2025, the petitioner already appeared before the I.O., co-operated in the investigation of the case and submitted all the GST documents etc. before the Investigating Authority. He is still ready and willing to co-operate the I.O. in further investigation of this case if he is granted with the privilege of pre-arrest bail.

¶21

Mr. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submitted in this regard that the present petitioner is not the F.I.R. named accused person and the F.I.R. was basically filed against one Chibang Pal and from the note of the I.O., it is also seen that the charge-sheet has already been filed against the said accused Chibang Pal and investigation is still under process against other accused persons. However, the present petitioner has co-operated in the investigation after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail.

¶22

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels of both sides, materials available in the Case Diary as well as the conduct of the accused/petitioner, who has already appeared before the I.O. and co-operated in the investigation of the case, I find that the custodial interrogation of the

¶23

Page No.# 3/3

¶24

present accused/ petitioner is not necessary in this case and hence, I find it a fit case to extend the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail, granted to the accused/petitioner vide order dated 10.03.2025, is hereby made absolute in the same terms and conditions.

¶25

The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of in terms above.

¶26

The Case Diary be sent back.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Tayo Tallom Rending v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tayo Tallom Rending v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rasmil Ali @ Babuli Ali Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

MD Roijuddin @ Rohiz Uddin Vs the State of Assam

MD Rajikul Islam@ Rajikul Isalam Vs the State of Assam

Shukkur Ali @ Sukur Ali and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam

Abjal Hussain Laskar Vs the State of Assam

Techi Alban Vs the State of Assam