The Gauhati High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the petitioner was already arrested in connection with the case.
The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040002982025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : AB/22/2025
Smti Marbom Lollen @ Tana Nanu
Wife of Shri Tana Sony, resident of Nirjuli, PO and PS Nirjuli, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Dilip Saikia, Toko Rini,T Pumbo,T Loma
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER
Date : 03.03.2025
Mr. M. Ete, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous, since the petitioner has already been arrested in connection with this case. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of the same.
In view of above, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of being rendered infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smti Marbom Lollen @ Tana Nanu
The State of AP
Mitali Thakuria
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
