Petitioner sought relief; the State reported that a charge-sheet had been filed. Counsel for petitioner stated he would pursue remedies before the trial court. The petition was accordingly closed and disposed of without any adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010165052025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1820/2025
MUSTAKIN AHMED SON OF CHAYAD ALI R/O VILL- TAPTOLA, P.S. BHURAGAON, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J KHATANIAR,
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER
Date : 04.09.2025
Page No.# 2/2
State of Assam submits that charge-sheet, in respect of the instant case, has been laid vide charge-sheet No. 48/2025 dated 29.05.2025.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be disposed of in view of the charge-sheet having been filed.
Mustakin Ahmed son of Chayad Ali
The State of Assam rep. by the PP, Assam
Shamima Jahan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
