Pawar Mor Vs The State of Ap

2. By an order dated 22.10.2025, the accused applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail with a direction to released him on execution of bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with 2(two) sureties of like amount to the

¶18

Page No.# 2/3

¶19

satisfaction of arresting authority subject to the following conditions:

¶20

(i) that the applicant shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the case on 24.10.2025 to enable recording of his statement; (ii) that the applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation of the case and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required in connection with the investigation of the aforesaid P.S. Case; and

¶21

(iii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶22

3. In compliance of the bail condition No.1, the accused applicant appeared before the I.O. of the case on 24.10.2025, on such appearance, the accused applicant was arrested in connection with Chimpu P.S. Case No.34/2025, under Sections 61(2)/318(4) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 10(1)/10(2)/11 of the Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. After execution of the bail bond and on completion of the necessary formalities, the accused applicant was released on bail on the strength of the interim anticipatory bail granted on 22.10.2025.

¶23

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter also the accused applicant had appeared before the I.O. of the case on various dates i.e. on 25.10.2025, 26.10.2025, 31.10.2025 and 01.11.2025 and his mobile phone was also seized by the I. O. of the case on 31.10.2025. It is further submitted that the accused applicant had duly complied with the

¶24

Page No.# 3/3

¶25

directions and conditions imposed upon him while granting interim anticipatory bail and has been cooperating with the I.O. of the case as and when called for. He further submits that the accused applicant although is from Haryana, as and when called by the I.O., he had appeared before the I.O and has undertaken that he will cooperate with the I.O. in future also. Therefore, the learned counsel submits his interim anticipatory bail application may be regularised and made absolute.

¶26

5. Upon hearing the parties and on perusal of the record, it appears that the accused applicant is cooperating with the I.O. of the case for investigation of the instant case and he is appearing as and when called for. In view of the above and as the accused has already been arrested and released on bail, the interim bail granted to the accused on 22.10.2025, is hereby regularised and made absolute on the same terms and conditions, with the further conditions that the accused applicant shall continue to cooperate and appear before the I.O. of the case, as and when called for.

¶27

6. This bail order shall be read along with the order dated 22.10.2025.

¶28

7. With the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

¶29

Return the case diary.

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

Comparing Assistant

Pawar Mor v. The State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawar Mor v. The State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shah Newaz Khan and 5 Ors. Vs the State of Nagaland and 5 Ors.

Sri Rabin Talukdar Vs M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs on the Death of MD Nur Alam Alias Nur Alam Khan

Eto Ete Vs Amjad Tak and 2 Ors.

Pawan Mor Vs The State of Ap

Shridam Barman Vs The State of Ap