10. From the impugned order passed by the learned Wakf of Tribunal, it appears that the learned Tribunal had taken up issue No.3 regarding misjoinder and non-joinder of parties.In respect of issue No.3, it was held that the case was not bad for misjoinder and non-joinder of parties. In respect of issue No.4, it was held that the respondent No.4, Abdul Khalique Choudhury, is well educated and literate in comparison to the petitioner herein, namely, Nurul Islam Choudhury, and accordingly, it was held that the order of the Chief Executive Officer, Assam Board of Wakfs is not correct, legal and valid in terms of Wakf-nama No.3586. In respect of issue No.5, it was held that the petitioner did not took over charge of Mutawalli. In respect of issue No.6, although there was a discussion but the following cannot be easily deciphered. However, in the later part of the order, it has been reflected that in view of decision of issue No.4 was in the favour of respondent No.4, issue Nos.5 and 6 is also decided in favour of the respondent No.4 herein. In respect of issue No.7, the Tribunal is not very clear. However, in the later part of the judgment, it has been mentioned that the issue No.7 is also decided in favour of the respondent No.4.
