Writ petition seeking payment was withdrawn after counsel informed the court the petitioner had already received the amount; court dismissed it on withdrawal and reprimanded both counsels for concealing the disbursement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010028112023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/782/2023
PARIKSHIT CHANDRA DAS
S/O- LT. CHANDI CH. DAS, R/O- SUNSHINE TOWER, FLAT NO. 5-D, MALIGAON CHARIALI, P.S. JALUKBARI, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, N.F.RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GHY-11
2:RAILWAY BOARD UNDER THE MINISTRY OF RAILWAY RAIL BHAWAN NEW DELHI-1 RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI
3:NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION) MALIGAON GHY-11
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER/ CON 4 N.F.RAILWAY MALIGAON GHY-11 5:THE DY. CHIEF ENGINEER/ CON SILAPATHAR N.F. RAILWAY DIST.- DHEMAJI PIN- 787059
6:FA AND CAO/CON/N.F. RAILWAY/ MALIGAON
Page No.# 2/3
GHY-1
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. J Sarmah
Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. A Gayan
CGC
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
18.09.2024
Mr. J Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that taking into account that the petitioner has already received the amount, the petitioner would not like to press the instant writ petition.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Parikshit Chandra Das
The Union of India and 5 Ors rep. by the General Manager, N.F. Railway
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
