Dismissed
Ram Kumar Nunia and 2 Ors. v. the Union of India and 6 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/7574/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010290352023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010290352023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010290352023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7574/2023
RAM KUMAR NUNIA AND 2 ORS S/O HIRALAL NUNIA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BEHUL, PO SINGALLA, PS AND DIST HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 788151
2: RAJEN BORUAH S/O KESHAB BORUAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIYANI PO AND PS GHILAMARA 787053 DIST LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
3: DESRANG BARO S/O LABEN BARO. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANDHASIDHANI PO BAGHMARA BAZAR PS PATACHARKUCHI DIST BARPETA ASSAM 78132
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA , NEW DELHI 01
2:THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN NO. 12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 110003
Page No.# 2/3
STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI 06
4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE BLOCK NO.10 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 110003
5:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHATRA SEEMA BALL 5-6 VIVEKANANDA MARG EAST BLOCK R.K PURA NEW DELHI 22
6:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE(RECRUITMENT) EAST BLOCK 07 LEVEL 4 SECTOR 01 R.K PURAM NEW DELHI 66
7:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE BLOCK 13 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 0
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U SAIKIA, MR. S D ROY,MS. S SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MRS. R DEVI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 19-08-2024
Page No.# 3/3
None appears for the petitioners.
Ms. R. Devi, learned CGC is present on behalf of the respondents.
The petitioners counsel was absent even on the previous occasion i.e. on 16-082024 when the matter was listed before this Court. On that day, this Court has granted final opportunity to the petitioners to appear and argue the matter. Despite the same, petitioners counsel has not appeared today also.
In view of the above, it is apparent that the petitioners are no longer interested to pursue this matter any further. As such, this writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
RAM KUMAR NUNIA AND 2 ORS
THE UNION OF INDIA
SUMAN SHYAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court