The Gauhati High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Hav. Mobinul Hoque against the State of Assam and various police officials for non-prosecution on 11.06.2024. The petitioner failed to appear on the day of hearing despite prior notices.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010020222014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6949/2014
HAV. MOBINUL HOQUE, S/O ANOWARUL HOQUE R/O VILL- CHALCHALI P.S. CHALCHALI, P.S. SAMAGURI DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM.
3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE A
ASSAM DISTRICT- KAMRUP GUWAHATI ASSAM.
4:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL TAP ASSAM DIST. KAMRUP GUWAHATI ASSAM.
5:THE COMMANDANT
Page No.# 2/2
15TH A.P. IR BATTALION ERALIGOOL KARIMGANJ
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.R K MAZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 11.06.2024
None appears for the petitioner on call.
Mr. R. Dhar, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondent is present.
It is seen that on the last two occasions also, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
HAV. MOB INUL HOQUE
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL
THE COMMANDANT
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
