Pabitra Pran Saikia v. Union Bank of India and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner seeking closure of writ petition as underlying restitution matter disposed by DRT, deeming it infructuous; court closed the petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The present writ petition closed being infructuous.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010255952023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6633/2023
PABITRA PRAN SAIKIA SON OF LATE ROHITESWAR SAIKIA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 48, GMCH ROAD, KACHARI BASTI, GUWAHATI- 781005.
VERSUS
UNION BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MAIDAMGAON BRANCH, BASISTHA ROAD, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI- 28, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
2:THE RECOVERY OFFICER DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM.
3:SUBHASH SINGH SON OF LATE MOTI PRASAD SINGH
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 238B
GUWAHATI CLUB GNB ROAD
GUWAHATI- 781003 KAMRUP METRO
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pabitra Pran Saikia
- respondent
Union Bank of India represented by its Branch Manager
- respondent
The Recovery Officer
- respondent
Subhash Singh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/6633/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court