The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition became infructuous due to a new cause of action. The High Court dismissed the petition on these grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010233772024
2024:GAU-AS:11012
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5723/2024
M/S COASTAL PROJECTS LIMITED
237, 2ND FLOOR, BAPUJI NAGAR, BHUBNESWAR 751009, ORISSA, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GEN. MANAGER, MR. G JANARDHAN REDDY, S/O- G JAYARAMI REDDY, AGE-36 YRS, R/O- 1-161B, KALASAMMUDRAM, KADIRI, P.O- KALASAMUDRAM, DIST- ANANTHAPURAMU, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN-515501
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
THROUGH THE SECRETARY , MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-01
2:NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR RAJA HOUSE 30-31 NEHRU PLACE NEW DELHI-110019
NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED 31 NIGAMANANDA BHAWAN HARISH THAKUR ROAD KRISHNA NAGAR WEST TRIPURA PIN-799001
Page No.# 2/3
4:THE GROUP GENERAL MANAGER
NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED
HOUSE NO. 10 HOUSING COLONY RANGAMANCHA PATH RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-781006 KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM 5:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER COMMERCIAL CLIENTS GROUP BR 13039 IST FLOOR NSL ICON DOOR NO-8-2-684/2/A ANAND BANJARA COLONY OPPOSITE HOTEL FORTUNE PARK VALLABHA ROAD NO-12 BANJARA HILLS HYDERABAD-50003
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A BHATRA, MR. R K BHATRA,MR A BHATRA,MR. B D DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
11.11.2024
Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel representing Mr. B.D. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous as a new cause of action has arisen.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous in view of a
Page No.# 3/3
new cause of action, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to take resort to appropriate remedy as regards the new cause of action.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous when a petitioner establishes a new cause of action.
M/S COASTAL PROJECTS LIMITED
THE UNION OF INDIA
MANISH CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
