M/s Mepung Enterprises v. The State of Ap and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC040015712023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC040015712023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040015712023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/544/2023
M/s Mepung Enterprises Represented by its Proprietor Shri Nabam Rallo, Son of Nabam Saha, Village Reising, P.O/P.S Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh, Pin 791112. Phone No. 9402046715
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Others represented by the Chief Engineer to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Rural Work Department, Itanagar. 2:The Superintendent Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Work Department Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Executive Engineer/DPIU Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Work Department Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Tender Evaluation Committee Age: 0 Occupation : headed by the Chairman cum Superintending Engineer RWD Yachuli. 6:M/s Puna Hinda Age: 0 Occupation :
Page No.# 2/2
through its proprietor Shri Puna Hinda C/o Time Library Akash Deep Ganaga Market Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : 2 K Tari, Khoda Tari
Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC(RWD)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 24-09-2024
Mr. K. Tari, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks withdraw of the writ petition.
Prayer is allowed.
Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel for the Rural Works Development is present.
The matter stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s Mepung Enterprises
The State of AP
Kalayan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court