Dipak Sharma v. the State of Assam and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged a suspension order which was recalled and he was reinstated before the writ petition was disposed of as not pressed.
The petitioner challenged a suspension order which was recalled and he was reinstated before the writ petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010216512024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5401/2024
DIPAK SHARMA
S/O SRI RAJEN SHARMA, R/O VILL- CHUNGI MOLIA, P.S.-TITABOR, P.O.TAMULBARI, DIST- JORHAT, PIN-785616, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HANDLOOM, TEXTILE AND SERICULTURE DEPARTMENT, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ARTFED (ASSAM APEX WEAVERS AND ARTISANS COOPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.) A.K. AZAD ROAD REHABARI GUWAHATI-08
3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES SADIYA CHAPAKHOWA DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-78615
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M BORAH, LUAYING,MRS L BORUAH,MR. B B BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HANDLOOM, TEXTILE AND SERICULTURE, MR. A JAHID (R-2)
Page No.# 2/2
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
14.11.2024
Challenge made in this Writ Petition is to the Order dated 25.06.2024 by which the petitioner was placed under suspension. Today, the learned counsels appearing for rival parties submit that the said order of suspension has been recalled and the petitioner has been reinstated into service vide Order dated 08.11.2024.
The learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. M Bora submits that in view of the said order, the petitioner would not like to pursue the matter any further. Mr. R Dhar, learned counsel appears for respondent Nos. 1 & 3 and agrees to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as not pressed. The Order dated 08.11.2024 produced before this Court shall be kept on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
DIPAK SHARMA
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ARTFED
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES
NELSON SAILO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court