A writ petition filed by a former contractual licensee whose guest house contract was terminated was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear for the hearing despite the respondent being present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010263352017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4782/2017
UTPAL KALITA
S/O- LATE MAHESWAR KALITA, R/O- SENAPATI ROAD, SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI- 781003, DIST- KAMRUPM, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and ANR. THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES AND SERICULTURE DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE DIRECTOR OF HANDLOOM AND TEXTILE ASSAM VASTRA BHAWAN AMBARI GUWAHATI- 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS.J BORAH, MR. J ROY,MR.D BANIA,MR.R MAJUMDAR,MR.S C BISWAS
Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
12.09.2024
Page No.# 2/3
Counsel for the Handloom and Textile Department appearing for the respondent is present.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
UTPAL KALITA
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THE DIRECTOR OF HANDLOOM AND TEXTILE ASSAM
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
