Jamir Uddin v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, SMC President, approached HC after DEEO instructed removal under RCE Rule 5. Court noted that issue was withdrawn by DEEO pursuant to a High Court order. Held writ petition infructuous and dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010180592024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4479/2024
JAMIR UDDIN SON OF RUSTOM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PHALIHAMARI PATHAR, P.O.- PHALIHAMARI PATHAR, DISTRICT- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782127.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (DC) MORIGAON DISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105.
4:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION) MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105.
5:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER (DEEO) MORIGAON
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JAMIR UDDIN SON OF RUSTOM ALI
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
Coram
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/4479/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court