The Court held that the land in question remained Government Khas land and had not yet been allotted to the petitioners. Since the dispute involved factual questions requiring evidence, the Court refused to entertain the writ petition and directed the petitioners to approach the civil court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010010682019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/420/2019
TEZPUR IDDGAH COMMITTEE AND ANR. HAVING ITS OFFICE AT TEZPUR AND REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, I.E. PETITIONER NO.2.
2: MD. AZAZ HUSSAIN
S/O. LT. SEIKH TAZUDDIN R/O. BARIKA SUBURI TEZPUR P.O. AND P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM SECRETARY OF TEZPUR IDDGAH COMMITTEE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF REVENUE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE DY. COMMISSIONER SONITPUR DIST. SONITPUR PIN-784105 ASSAM.
3:SRI NILAKSHYA SARMA S/O. SRI BHUPEN SARMA R/O. LDS ROAD (GARUWANPATTY) TEZPUR TOWN P.O. AND P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. S. Ali, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Ms. N. Bordoloi, Advocate Ms. S. Sarma, Govt. Advocate Mr. G. Choudhury, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
08.08.2024
Heard Mr. S. Ali, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Ms. N. Bodoloi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.1; Ms. S. Sarma, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.2 and Mr. G. Choudhury, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.3.
Page No.# 3/3
“Bharat Mata Uzan Samiti”, the Deputy Commissioner, Sonitpur has used the word “Iddgah Field” (Chitrabon Bakori) and submitted a representation not to use the word “Chitrabon Bakori” with the Iddgah Field.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the use of the term 'Chitrabon Bakori' for land reserved for the Tezpur Iddgah Committee is maintainable in its present form?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
PIL No.100/2015Referred¶21
Tezpur Iddgah Committee And Anr
The State of Assam And 2 Ors
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
