n d 9. In addition to that, on 2 June, 2023, an affidavit-in-opposition was filed by the respondent Nos.2 & 3 stating inter-alia that upon verification of the claims of the petitioners as provided in the writ petition, the ACA was able to find out only copies of the work orders that were issued to the petitioners, but no relevant documents relating to calling of tenders and documents justifying the works done or completed including the Ledger Account and the Measurement Book mentioned by the petitioners were found. It was also mentioned that there exists no sufficient document(s) or material(s) available to verify the purported works claimed to have been executed by the petitioners, and as such, it was difficult on the part of the ACA to accept the claims of the petitioners. It was also mentioned that an FIR was lodged by the ACA for alleged misappropriation of funds during the period from 2016-18 being Fatasil Ambari P.S. Case No.817/2021, under Sections 120B/406/409/420/469/34 of the IPC. In addition to that, in PIL No.47/2015, all the documents of the ACA were seized and as per the Seizure Memo received from the Assam Police, there was a File at Sl. No.228 of the Seizure Memo in the name of “Surya Constructions, East and West Stands, Barsapara Stadium”. On 10.01.2024, an additional affidavit-in-opposition was filed by the respondent Nos.2 to 4. The contents of the said affidavit-in-opposition are pari-materia to the affidavit filed by the same respondents in WP(C) No.3891/2020 and for the sake of brevity, this Court is not repeating the same.
