Petitioner's counsel informed court that client no longer presses the application. The State Counsel did not object. The Writ Petition was dismissed upon withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010113252016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3498/2016
DINESH CHANDRA TAHBILDAR
S/O LT. BALIRAM TAHBILDAR, R/O KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI, DISTKAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LAND and REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, ASSAM
2:THE DIRECTOR LAND AND REVENUE ASSAM RUPNAGAR GHY-32
3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI
4:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER GUWAHATI RE-SETTLEMENT OPERATION GUWAHATI
5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE DISPUR KAMRUP ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A ULLAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
05.03.2024
Ms. S. Nazneen, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is instruction from the client not to press this application.
Shri G. Bokolial, learned State Counsel does not object to the said prayer. Writ petition accordingly stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
DINESH CHANDRA TAHBILDAR
THE STATE OF ASSAM
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
